Donald Trump vs. Ruth Bader Gingsburg

Posted by

I understand that chief justice, Ruth Bader Gingsburg, is an older woman set in her ways, but she was the culprit in starting this firestorm of political drama this week. I guess frustrated with the state of the presidential campaign, Gingsburg criticized the Donald in a way that of course prompted a major tantrum from the #whineylittlebitch.

Gingsburg went so far as to say, “He is a faker. He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. … How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that.”

Ruth Bader Gingsburg

Oh snap! She called him out #BIGLY!

In usual Trump fashion, Donald behaved like a #whineylittlebitch, acting as if the woman hurt his orange little feelings.

U.S. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during a campaign stop in Tampa, Florida

Trump responded by stating, “For someone on the Supreme Court who is going to be calling balls and strikes in the future based upon whatever the next president and Congress does, that strikes me as inherently biased and out of the realm.

Trump has also questioned her sanity and has requested her resignation from the bench…all laughable as millions of people across our great nation think Donald Trump is suffering some form of dementia or mental illness.

At the end to day, its safe to say that the Chief Justice doesn’t give a flying fck about how people respond to her comments. Her appointment as chief justice is a lifetime appointment. No wonder why she could care less about offending anyone, especially Donald Trump.


  1. As much as a hate to stay it, TECHNICALLY, I think Trump is correct, at least in that she really shouldn’t be commenting to directly on a Presidential election like this. I don’t think any of the Justices should. IDEALLY, they should be above-politics. Of course we know that the status of the court as been completely political now for decades, so this isn’t really new.

    That doesn’t mean she needs to resign (or recuse herself in any future cases involving his administration should Trump become President, *shudder*, as some others have suggested), but I do think she should not talk about things like this.

    1. Yeah, she shouldn’t have said anything about the election. But in her defense, I think she is surprised that Donald Trump has made it as far as he did. I mean, the man is a moron who speaks like he’s a third grader. I think those who support him have the cognitive ability of a third grader. But she should have known better because of her position on the Supreme Court. She has to be unbiased when she rules, and taking a position against Donald Trump makes her seem totally biased. However, because I can’t stand Donald Trump, I took pleasure in hearing her talk shyt about his moronic azz. lmao!

      1. Yeah, I agree with her completely too. Just saying that, because of her position, she shouldn’t have said it. But Trump is a moron.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.